It was 5.23 pm on 21st august 2004 when Awami
League chief Sheikh Hasina was wrapping up a rally protesting Sylhet blasts. A
wave of grenade attacks on her left at least 16 people killed and left around
200 persons critically injured including top Awami League leaders Abdur Razzak,
Amir Hossain Amu, Suranjit Sengupta, Ivy Rahman and Kazi Zafarullah.
The party secretary on Women affairs Ivy
Rahman died in the Hospital later in the day. The unknown assailants fired
seven bullets at the bulletproof SUV that Hasina boarded immediately after the
blast.
The unusually poor deployment of police at the
rally and the absence of forces on nearby building rooftops are a remarkable
deviation from the usual practice.
Motaher Hossain, general secretary of AL
Krishak League said some people on the roof of Ramna hotel and adjacent
building were throwing bombs. At least 13 grenades exploded one after another,
and also who were present on the spot told a white Microbus carried of some
injured person who were among the assailant and were wounded by their own bomb.
Blame game started at the very moment Hasina
spoke out loud about government’s conspiracy to kill the remaining member of
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujiber Rahman’s remaining family members, BNP leaders hold
back and Abdul Mannan Bhuiyan commented that they have blamed the government
out of emotion. But soon BNP leaders changed their tone and started to blame AL
for attacking their own rally, they argued AL had done it to destabilize the
country and discredit the government only to grab the power.
Fiction and conspiracy theories were put
forward by various columnists in the media. Pro Awami columnists blamed the
fundamentalist forces and the right wing coalition government for this attack
while pro BNP columnists blamed AL and pointed finger towards the country’s
biggest neighbor India.
However most columnists inclined towards Awami
league and left parties and leaders and activists of these parties discovered a
pattern in the bomb blasts. In most cases secular forces and those who believe
in culture, tradition and democratic values had been the target. The same group
was behind the attack on Hasina’s rally.
Those pro BNP columnists pick up the same
incident and argued Hasina was not the target of those assailants, if she were
their target then why none of those grenades fall on the truck and also wrote
thousand pages about AL’s possible motive behind this?
Some suspected it as a plot by international
Muslim extremist groups; some pointed towards the association of ISI (Inter
Services Intelligence); while Jamaat leader Matiur Rahman Nizami believes it is
the work of “well known enemies of Islam” who masterminded, through various
covert organizations, to carry out such brutal murders.
It became increasingly hard to dig out the
truth from these fictions. With conspiracy theories you can use any piece of
evidence to either prove or disprove your opinion and you can pick up any
particular incident to strengthen your position. Truth has many faces but with
conspiracy theory all you can achieve is a thousand shade of the truth and all
these are equally probable and could be equally false.
In this present regime we have finally a
charge sheet that clearly indicates Awami Leagues position is correct in this
issue, RAB and other government intelligence agency finally concluded that
Islamic militants are behind this attack and also a small fraction of BNP activists
patronized this attack.
But is it the whole truth or only a facade?
Lets look at the proceedings of the investigations.
To investigate 21st August 2004 bomb blast
then BNP government first employed metropolitan police’s detective branch to
investigate this incident, then this case was handed over to the criminal
investigation department of Bangladesh Police. Five investigating officer under
3 officers in charge investigated this incident for over 4 years and they had
submitted two charge sheet contradicting each other.
What is the progress in this case? When ever
you ask this question to a law enforcement officer, a certain reply will be
that “we are still investigating this matter. We had some lead but for the sake
of this on going investigation we can not tell you anything.” Even after
submitting charge sheet against 22 person in June 11, 2008 and acquitting all
other person found guilty (on the first charge sheet presented by the CID),
still the investigation has not been closed. So far we have 2 persons who
claimed that they had actively participated in this failed assassination. On
26th June, 2005 Joj Miah from Noakhali confessed to police that for 5000 taka
he carried out this attack under the order of Subrata Bain, a top terrorist.
Subrata Bain and his group had close ties with some notorious AL leaders and
they fled to India after alliance government took over the state in October
2001. He confessed to a magistrate that he had never seen any grenade before
but Subrata Bain, Joy, Molla Masud ordered him to participate in this
assassination. ASP of Police [CID] Abdur Rashid was the investigation officer
then.
But the government were not satisfied with
this finding so led by Munsi Atikur Rahman the investigation continued. The
investigation found a paved path established by the coalition government.
So far we have two investigation reports, one
of them was by Justice Jaynul Abedin, chairman of the one man investigation
committee formed by the government to investigate 21st august grenade attack on
Awami leagues rally. Awami League has rejected this report claiming it lacks
neutrality. And another one was submitted by the Supreme Court Bar Association.
According to Moudud Ahmed, who was Law minister at that time, claimed that this
inquiry committee is illegal.
Jaynul Abedin’s investigation report:
Justice Jaynul Abedin had submitted his 162
pages manuscript of coalition governments collective story on 2nd October 2004.
He was the member and chairman of one man inquiry committee formed by the
government to investigate the grenade attack on Awami League rally on 21st
august. On the eve of this submission those authorities in concern had invited
journalist to give some insight of the report.
After scrutiny, critical and painstaking
analysis, Jaynul Abedin did omit the possibility that coalition government and
his ally, some extremist religious group and a part of Awami League was behind
this heinous attack on Awami League activists.
But he did claim with certainty that a foreign
intelligence agency actively participated in this event. They trained those
assailants and equipped them with necessary ammunitions. He described this
event on that informal press conference, “this incident is a naked attack on
the independence and sovereignty of the country.”
Because Jaynul Abedin was a BNP activist in
the past, Awami League questioned the neutrality of the investigation
committee. Even though 123 people given their statement to this committee but
that does not include Sheikh Hasina, who was the prime target of this massacre.
Sheikh Hasina rejected the call for her statement.
In that one and half hour informal briefing on
the report prior to its submission Jaynul concluded “the commission may not
have received cooperation from all, which may have somewhat hindered the
investigation, but the inquiry is in no way incomplete.”
Like any other investigation report submitted
by any government formed investigation committee it also embraced the fate to
remain unpublished till-to-date.
The Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA)
inquiry committee report:
On 22nd august, 2004, immediately after the
grenade attack, The Supreme Court Bar Association formed an inquiry committee.
Barrister Kamal Hossain was elected as the chairman of that committee and the
other members of this committee were Rokonuddin Mahmud, Abdul Malek,
Amir-ul-Islam, M Zahir and Muhammad Ayenuddin.
While Hasina wrapped up the rally, at that very
moment a grenade went off loud and it was followed by at least 10 such
explosions. Awami League leaders formed a human shield to cover Hasina from the
splinter, they were injured in this process and soon after they escorted Hasina
to her bullet proof SUV and Hasina left for Sudha Sadan, while on the move that
SUV was attacked by bullets. Witnesses on their statement confirmed the SCBA
inquiry committee that they had not seen any member of the law enforcing agency
in action there.
After inspecting the place of occurrence on
27th august 2004 they went to Sudha Sadan, where Hasina assured the committee
her full cooperation to find out the truth. Hasina’s security personal and her
driver gave their statement to this committee and this committee also inspected
the SUV.
Driver on his statement told the committee
that he drove towards the east, then took a left turn and then he drove towards
Sudha Sadan through zero point. But police officers deployed at the rally on
21st August on their statement said to inquiry committee, SUV carrying Sheikh
Hasina away from that place drove westward, took a right turn, and then went to
Sudha Sadan through zero point.
On 16th, 17th, 18th September the committee
watched the video tape recorded by ATN, Channel I and NTV. On ATN video tape
they saw a young man purposefully looking towards the multi storied Dhaka City
Bhaban. Apart from this, on Channel I and NTV footage some suspicious incidents
were seen by the committee members.
The inquiry committee sent two letters to
Prime Minister Khaleda Zia, requesting her to extend cooperation for the
inquiry and to direct the law enforcing agency to cooperate with them in
interest of its work.
A letter was sent from the inquiry committee
to IGP Shahudul Huq on 29 August 2004 requesting him to direct the police
authorities to inform the inquiry committee of the number of persons who were
deployed for maintaining the law and order in the public meeting on 21st August
2004 with the descriptions of their duties and locations.
After 3 weeks another letter was sent to him,
requesting for his interview. The inquiry committee requested state minister of
home affairs, but all of them turned down their request further more the law
minister Moudud Ahmed on several occasion said that this inquiry committee had
no legal basis and any report of any such illegal committee should not be
recognized.
But the government did inform the SCBA inquiry
committee that they had done every thing that is possible for them and sent a
copy of the statement made by the State Minister for Home Affairs in the
Parliament. In that speech the State Minister mentioned that the police made
all out efforts to identify the culprits immediately after the incident and
within 24 hours a Judicial Inquiry Commission was constituted with a judge of
the Supreme Court as the sole Member. He also mentioned that the Government
also arranged for an “international” inquiry into the 21st August incident side
by side with Bangladesh police investigation and in response to the Government
invitation 3 (three) teams from Interpol visited Bangladesh and helped the
inquiry. Besides this, the government had also taken cooperation of FBI of USA.
The SCBA inquiry committee made repeated
requests at the highest levels of the government for obtaining copies of
reports of earlier bomb-blasts, the report of the ‘judicial inquiry’ into the
21 August, 2004 constituted by the Government, and other documents and
information, but such requests have till-to-date were turned down.
The Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA)
inquiry committee concluded it was a pre-planned attack, carried out on the
basis of a carefully prepared plan, targeting Sheikh Hasina and other leaders
and persons attending the rally. The firing of the bullets and grenades on the
vehicle by which she was leaving the place of occurrence, confirms that she was
the target.
The committee urged government to publish all
reports of investigation within one month or else public may lead to believe
attempt on Sheikh Hasina’s life was to some extent was patronized by this
government.
The alleged HUJI rage against Awami League:
Some columnists claimed in the media that the
AL government, after assuming power in 1996 barred Islamic scholars from
issuing fatwa’s through a High Court order. The government also came on strong
against the right wing protesters and arrested hundreds across the country.
This had angered HUJI.
Mufti
Abdul Hannan, the operative
commander of the banned Harkatul Jihad-al-Islami revealed on 19th
November 2006.
“I masterminded all grenade attacks across the
country excepting the August 21, 2004 gruesome attack on the AL rally, and
three people financed the outfit for carrying out the attacks”
“Kajol was given the responsibility to collect
funds and grenades for the attack. They decided that 12 persons would carry out
the attack and Kajol and Abu Jandal would select the commanders of the
operation. It was decided that Kajol and Jandal brief the attackers about their
positions and Jandal would throw the first grenade after getting instruction
from Sayeed. The others would throw their grenades at around the same time.
Hannan said the attackers targeted the truck and left the spot individually
after the operation.”
However question remains as why HUJI chose to
attack Hasina after all those years and during the period when there was a row
of political killings of Awami League leaders (Kibria, Ahsan Master etc.) were
happening. HUJI members were used but who masterminded the attack?
The BNP connection:
In January 2008, former deputy minister for
information of the BNP government Abdus Salam Pintu was arrested for his
involvement with the grenade attacks on Awami League rally on August 21 in 2004.
He was arrested on the basis of confessional statement made earlier by detained
Mufti Hannan who claimed that the attack on the AL rally was planned at the
official residence of the former Deputy Minister. Hannan said that Pintu was
present at the meeting and later supplied the grenades.
He made startling disclosure to interrogators
about the involvement of former State Minister of Home Lutfuzzaman Babar and
‘Hawa Bhaban’ in the grenade attacks. From
The New Nation:
“The CID officer said they were certain after
the arrest of Mufti Hannan and Pintu that the attack on the AL rally had been
aided and abetted by Lutfuzzaman Babar and the Hawa Bhaban.
“To hide the truth, former investigation
officer Ruhul Amin, a CID officer, had gone to Pintu’s house several times,” he
said, and added, “former State Minister of Home Babar was involved in the
entire process and Pintu would regularly inquire with him about the progress.”
Pintu’s counsel Advocate Sanaullah Mia,
however, told : “He was implicated only because his cousin Maulana Tajul Islam,
a militant leader and an accused in the grenade attack case, had visited his
house when Pintu was a Minister,”
HUJI is the culprit but who used them and why?
On June 11, 2008 charges were finally made
against 22 persons including top Harkat-ul-Jihad (Huji) leader Mufti Abdul
Hannan and BNP leader and former deputy minister Abdus Salam Pintu.
Newspaper reports say:
“CID Chief Additional Inspector General Jabed
Patwari said HUJI top leaders planned and carried out the attacks to kill
Hasina as a few arrested attackers said in their confessional statements that
Hasina would harm Islam if she was alive and came to power again.
BNP leader Pintu is not involved with Huji but
he has been charged since the attackers had held two meetings at his residence
to take decision about the attack.”
But the question remains whether HUJI tried to
kill Hasina on their own or it was a political assassination plot linked by BNP
to take out the opposition. Like every other political massacre the 21st August
grenade attack on Hasina has no clear motive whatsoever and after 4 years of
investigation we are not certain whether those who were behind this ghastly
attack have finally been exposed. Will we be able to know the truth?
No comments:
Post a Comment